Procera AVH’s archived formula combines acetyl-L-carnitine, vinpocetine and huperzine A. The blend total does not substantiate claims to reverse years of memory decline.
This review examines the formula recorded in our earlier coverage. The archived amounts below are not confirmation of the label, stock, price or purchase terms available today. This editorial revision does not report a new personal trial or laboratory test.
Page Contents
AVH identifies this particular formula
The letters refer to the three ingredients in the earlier record. This is a different formulation from Procera XTF and Procera Protect, which have their own reviews. Similar brand names do not make their labels, trials or advertising histories interchangeable.
Formula recorded in the earlier review
The table preserves the earlier ingredient record for comparison, with obsolete Daily Value percentages omitted. Use the current pack label for a purchase decision. These are recorded label amounts, not dosing instructions.
Procera AVH Ingredients | |
| Ingredients | Amount Per Serving |
| Procera AVH (Proprietary Blend) | 1515 mg |
| Acetyl-L-Carnitine HCl, Vinpocetine, Huperzine A (from Huperzia serrata) (Whole Plant, Aerial Parts) | |
What is disclosed—and what is not
The archived 1,515 mg figure is the combined blend weight. Individual quantities are not shown. It would be incorrect to divide the total equally between the ingredients, or to infer the huperzine A quantity from how much space remains in a capsule.
ALCAR, vinpocetine and huperzine A have different chemical identities and pharmacological properties. An ingredient’s proposed mechanism cannot show that this particular combination improves day-to-day memory in healthy adults, much less reverses ageing. A relevant product trial must match the formula and population.
What happened in 2015?
The FTC announced that marketers of Procera AVH would relinquish $1.4 million to settle deceptive-advertising charges. Its account described $1 million for the FTC settlement and a $400,000 related California judgment. This is a dated enforcement record about the challenged marketing; it is not a new laboratory test of a bottle purchased today.
The earlier article blurred that historical case with a present-day verdict and encouraged readers to recreate the blend themselves. That is not an appropriate conclusion. A settlement does not supply missing ingredient quantities, and assembling the three substances independently would create a different, untested exposure.
Practical limits of the review
Current packaging and warnings take precedence over this archived table. Persistent or worsening memory problems should be assessed clinically rather than treated as proof that a supplement is needed. This page provides no basis for escalating servings or replacing a prescribed treatment.
Editorial assessment
Procera AVH is best evaluated through its exact label and the documented limits of its memory claims. The archive supports an explanation of the blend and advertising history, not a recommendation to use it as an anti-ageing treatment.
Sources checked
Related reading
For the review method and commercial relationships, see Nootropic Geek’s editorial standards.
